FANDOM

A Lone Tenno
  Loading editor
  • Any reason as to the revert of my edit on the Paris Prime page? I can assure you that the info is in fact correct.

      Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Hi there Mantuta! Do you play WF on PC? If you do, what's your IGN? I would like to play with you sometime (^_^)

      Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I did this because I think we need a page for something important as the Zariman, just didn't have time to do the page itself.

    Could you explain me why you reverted this and this?

      Loading editor
    • There's no point in adding a dead link, put it back when you've made the page.

      The Kuria give the story of where the queens came from and it does not sync up with Bilsa's story from the synthesis entries. So, neither Queen is Bilsa and the information on her does not belong on the page.

      And it's just weird sticking a link in the codex entry.

        Loading editor
    • There is a point, it's a step forward on creating the page. It's like alerting people that page needs to be created. Talking for personal experience, I created various pages (on other wiki) starting from red links.

      If you had checked the edit before mine, you would have seen that information was there who knows since when, and that I actually rephrased it to be a possibility instead of a certainty as it was phrased before. And as you can read in the imprint, that could really be one of the queens considering their origin, the kuria poem, and that precise episode. That's why you'll see a "could" in my edit and not a "is" as it was before.

      It could be weird but it doesn't have any sense not having a link exactly where the argument in question is talked for the first and only time.

        Loading editor
    • I'm going to revert those edits, if you still aren't convinced feel free to bring in admins for their opinion, as per this wiki policy, point 2.

        Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • The Knell does not gain a buff when getting a headshot on corpses or invulnerable targets. I've spent the morning testing this.

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • It's not bad info, it's incomplete (simply doesn't state that Knell doesn't work on bosses).

      Also, I'm merely doing my job as a Wikia editor to clear up confusion here.

        Loading editor
    • So, I must apologise for a mistake in my previous statement. I didn't see that the note said headshots on corpses grant the buff.

      Eitherway, I have removed the statement regarding corpses and added that invulnerable bosses do not grant the buff.

      Edit: On an extra note, if you're reading this, Mantuta hasn't been active since the day of the revert, so it's probably due to busyness or lack of time that no reply has been received.

        Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I noticed you reverted one of my recent contributions to Vandal. Why?

      Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • I have no idea what compelled you to revert the changes I made to the weapon comparison page regarding DPS columns. Not only is the information there incredibly deceptive, there is no methodology listed, and literally none of it is useful or applicable in any sort of comparison between weapons. Fire rate * weapon damage does not serve as a useful calculation to either new or educated players. You cannot simply say "I did not account for critical strikes" and accept that information for what it is. Furthermore, critical strikes is not in the least the only thing unnacounted for.

    DPS has no place here, as the weapon comparison page is a page for providing raw, indisuptable facts about weapons, not for theorycrafting, no matter how minor (there are other resources for that). Not only is there not a single reason for it to be there, but rather it is counterproductive and massively reduces the credibility of the page. This is not a case of me being faulted for removing the information. It should not have been put there in the first place. Why would I ask anyone before I remove information that is incorrect in its entirety? That is the whole point of allowing individuals to edit on their own.

    Edited in link for ease of access: Weapon Comparison | Brizingr5 (talk) 17:07, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • View all 28 replies
    • Is there any place where i can look up those old dps columns? (And i mean a table with all weapons together)

        Loading editor
    • 91.57.80.210 wrote:
      Is there any place where i can look up those old dps columns? (And i mean a table with all weapons together)

      http://dpsframe.com/

        Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to WARFRAME Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Gram v Scindo page.

    New to WARFRAME New to Wiki
    • WARFRAME: offers an overview on the game and the wiki.
    • FAQ: addresses most of the common problems encountered by players.
    • Glossary: offers a list of common terms used by veteran players.

    Please contact me or any active administrators if you need help!

      Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.