FANDOM

KidaTech

  • I was born on January 13
A Lone Tenno
  Loading editor
  • Hello, I am focusing on the fragment "suffers from low critical multiplier and lack of bonus damage on headshots"

    With the way it is constructed, it is:

    suffers from low critical multiplier
    and
    suffers from lack of bonus damage on headshots

    I propose an alternate edit, streamlining the phrasing, shifting the noun "lack" to the verb "lack":

    suffers from low critical multiplier
    and
    lacks bonus damage on headshots

      Loading editor
    • After reading your comment I edit it to "suffers from a low critical multiplier and no bonus damage on headshots". what do you think? my edit read more direct to the point.

        Loading editor
    • suffers from low critical multiplier
      and
      suffers from no bonus damage on headshots

      It seems like a double negative, even though I know it isn't.

        Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Navboxflower1

    Hey KidaTech,

    I appreciate your point on why you feel the video is unnecessary, however, there are dozens of others just like it on many pages that follow the exact same video format. If you are so adamant about the triviality of the videos then please talk to Tanchan about it or remove every one of his videos from each page (as a last resort), otherwise it is fine to keep that video on the Enduring Affliction page.

    The media section is for any form of media that is informative about the topic on hand. Just because it may restate info from the page or fares poorly on YouTube does not mean it should be excluded when its counterparts and other videos like it may stay.

    I'm going to undo your edit once more and put the video back on the page. Please consider what I've said on why the video does not need to be removed.

    Thank you,
    FINNER

    Navboxflower2

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • Our current policies to not mention anything about video content, only their file and page formatting. We also have had a very wide range of video editing "skill" over warframe's history, from the amateurs to the pro's (such as mikeb and folk), but have never really discouraged any from contributing (unless it was potentially embarrassing to watch).

      I personally have nothing against allowing all contributors to post their videos as long as we're not simply an advertising platform for them. If you want to get some other admin's/mod's in the discussion, feel free to drop a message on their wall and we can have a community discussion on the topic and possibly change some policies to better fit community needs. I have already talked to a few mods on the topic and they were proponents of removing useless videos, so this isn't a moot point to argue. Lets just do it civilly and correctly :)

      P.S.: jesus finner, fancy enough?

        Loading editor
    • I agree that any videos should be allowed unless obviously out of line or simply irrelevant, but it isn't for me to decide which is why I wanted to talk to Tanchan first. In any case, it's not a big deal either way so whatever KidaTech and you all decide is fine by me.

      Brizingr5 wrote:

      P.S.: jesus finner, fancy enough?

      Nah, I feel like I should go even fancier XD.

        Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to WARFRAME Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Fluctus page.

    New to WARFRAME New to Wiki
    • WARFRAME: offers an overview on the game and the wiki.
    • FAQ: addresses most of the common problems encountered by players.
    • Glossary: offers a list of common terms used by veteran players.

    Please contact me or any active administrators if you need help!

      Loading editor
    • A Lone Tenno
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.