Talk:Weapons/@comment-7645613-20141201173833/@comment-74.83.18.201-20141201232649

Ugh. . . . .nano-scale engineering should have solved many of the troubles he describes in there. As much as I like a hint of reasoning behind the way weapons function, crippleing guns due to some kind of internal defect does NOT make me a merry mutant. We live in age of nanotechnological splendor, not a backwater atomic wasteland like poorly terraformed Ceres and Demos. I'd rather have interchangeable gun parts with various positive and negatives (that affect traits that modifications cannot or have not) then this, but, with the removal of statistic altering helmets, I think my ideas gone the way of the Warrah.