Talk:Enemy Vulnerabilities/@comment-11753608-20130708163809/@comment-65.41.71.67-20130711045550

I've just said a bunch of things about the Dread being better than the Paris assuming that this chart was correct. Now I need to test it to see whether or not I've made a dumbass of myself. If anyone else wants to try this test, feel free. Go into a t3 and find a grineer medium over lvl 66, and hit him with an unmodded dread. WHY? Because if enemy damage resistance scales in the linear fashion this chart suggests, then the Dread will do literaly no damage. However, if it does do damage, then it shows immediately that enemy damage resistance scales in the same logarithmic way that warframes do.

Once we find that out, find the percentage of damage you dealt ocmpared to the base damage and work the equation backwards to see what their armor value is. Divide that number by that grineer medium's level to find how much armor he gains per level.

After that, do the same exact process in a t2 run. If the armor gained per level DOES NOT MATCH the first time, then enemies base armor values also don't scale linearly. If this is the case, it's going to be really difficult to test enemy resistance values. But we can worry about that if we find that's actually the case.