Talk:Amprex/@comment-2800:810:49D:8800:5869:70E7:A9B3:693B-20180425043935/@comment-24515081-20180425184156

well I mean you compare the things about them that are similar and/or serve the same purpose. They are both short range guns that can deal with multiple opponents. So compare those 3 things. The range of amprex has a limit while tigris has a combination of damage falloff and spread. I'n this regard Tigris is better because it can hit enemies at any distance (though it is suboptimal). Both weapons deal good damage but amprex pulls ahead. It does a better job of sustaining it's dps and has excellent critical stats meaning headshots will do more damage for amprex than for tigris. Amprex easily pulls ahead of tigris when it comes to groups of enemies as it doesn't need punchthrough and they don't need to line up.

Those are just some ways to compare these two weapons. Some more could be: Usability, sustainability, Crowd control, status performance, high armour enemy performance.

TLDR; yes, you can in fact compare apples to oranges.