Talk:Inaros/@comment-5080035-20160313144103/@comment-178.204.72.174-20160313195912

^

You seem to really enjoy taking nonsense arguments out of your smelly butt.

You even fail to understand why people complain about Inaros. It's not about his survivability, dimwit, but his skillset. It's all hard CC, regen, some armor...and that's it. How would you feel if Frost had different variations of Avalanche on all skills? I bet you'd hate it, lol.

"Any frame that can easily solo t4 for over an hour is far from shit" - except that every frame can do that, l2p please.

When things get serious, Inaros suddenly becomes a shitty mix of Radial Blind Excalibur, Chroma, and a Trinity. Assume that his 1st ability doesn't exist and he suddenly becomes just a Chroma w/ unreliable lingering CC and free healz, but w/o the damage amps that make the Chroma useful.

You know, you don't need many CC frames in the team, and there are frames that do it better. Trinity does the healing better than Inaros, Chroma's better at killing stuff, and Excalibur's just as good at using CL's instakills to the team's advantage.

Iunno why I'd want an Inaros in my team over anything else. If I were to choose my team's composition, I'd never choose Inaros. He's taking up a niche role, and that's his problem. Oh, and all his survivability is kind of wasted in a team w/ a Bless Trinity.

that's my opinion on the matter, and ofc other inaros haters may have an opinion different from mine, and I may have misunderstood them.