Talk:Chroma/@comment-73.207.204.221-20160905223711/@comment-49.48.244.230-20160912132339

I'm still baffled as to why ppl think 6500 armor or 95.6% reduction isn't so different from 22000 armor or 98.7% reduction.

Is it because it's "only 3%" in difference? Well. That's just wrong. When you look at the meaning of those % reduction, you'll see that 95.6% reduction means 4.4% taken, and 98.7% means 1.3% taken.

Notice the difference now? Still a no? Owh.

Look at those numbers again. 4.4% vs 1.3%... that's 3.28 to 1. It means, with 98.7% reduction, you can survive 328% more damage than with 95.6% reduction.

Hope you guys can stop spreading the "92% reduction is just as good as 98.7% reduction" nonsense now.

Also, your equation for max armor is wrong. It's [350 base * (1 base + 1.1 steel + 4.485 ward) * 10.465 vex] = 24k armor, not 7k.