Talk:Mesa/@comment-90.184.67.189-20160819203557

The peacemaker section has the text : This is not entirely true. What actually happens is that the cap of 175%  power efficiency  (or rather, minimum of 25% energy cost)  is applied AFTER power duration is taken into account. So if you have less than 100% power duration, then you can have more than 175% power efficiency before you hit the actual cap of 25% energy cost. The way this works makes me think that this is not a bug, but an inteded feature that just isn't very intuitive because of how the UI displays the values.
 * Due to a bug, when the energy upkeep is calculated, real Power Efficiency is taken into the account. In other words, having exactly 175% Power Efficiency may have a higher upkeep than having 190% Power Efficiency, due to this bug.