Talk:Lenz/@comment-6295009-20170831002503/@comment-12.129.118.172-20170914104256

The whole disposition argument is a tricky one. To start, the disposition is based on the popularity of the weapon, ie how often players use it as a whole. This is flawed because popularity changes constantly. There is always that one weapon that someone discovers is OP with a certain build and the whole community latches on to it for awhile and then moves on to the next one. So what is DE going to do, start with high disposition, then when the weapon is popular nerf the disposition, then when it is crap and noone uses it, raise the disposition? That is ridiculous. If the intent of rivens was to encourage players to have fun with otherwise crap weapons then establish a baseline and only have rivens or strong dispostion for weapons that fall below that baseline. For example if status or crit is less than 5 percent etc. Honestly, I think the whole idea of players whining about how "this whatever weapon is too OP" is a dumb one. Warframe is not competitive and the only competitive pvp element in the game has its own system for nerfing the strength of frames and weps. So all I'm hearing is "I'm jealous that I don't have this OP weapon" or "I invested a bunch of time/forma into a weapon and now this other guy is using a better weapon than me" wahhhhhhhhh *sob *sob This is not an insult to anyone in particular just a general observation. -Steiner