Talk:Xiphos/@comment-23.239.35.101-20160313233317/@comment-4793831-20160315064508

> that's how you state a probability

...of getting it in EXACTLY THREE RUNS. Not in general, because - surprise, surprise, - one person can do MORE runs, rendering this value completely useless.

> it still would not have been 1.4%

You seem to miss the part where it says "in 100 runs". I can add that it passes 50% mark on 535th run, if I didn't mess things up.