Talk:Rhino (Warframe)/@comment-72.64.217.68-20140606064302/@comment-50.103.1.91-20140611064402

"There's like 20 abilities that will let you safely revive someone, that does not qualify as my definition of a team player, reviving people should be a given."

Changing the Goalposts Fallacy.

You specifiy teamwork as your criteria, I provide a context where his skill benefits teamwork directly.

When confronted with such an obvious contradiction, you respond with some completely arbitrary horseshit about "my definition". Frankly, I don't give a fuck about your definition. In fact, give how you have to Jerrymander your "teamwork" definition around such an obvious function of teamwork (keeping them alive) I'll just say your definition is stupid.

Reviving people is NOT a given, no matter how much you want it to be. Nor does the existence of other skills being good for securing revives make Rhino any worse at it. (to add a Strawman Fallacy to your failures)

"The only Rhino I would consider a team player is one that uses a max blind rage roar, which is probably less than 1% of Rhinos.  Too the people who say stomp is good crowd control, radial blind and chaos are better."

Oh there's that Strawman Fallacy bugbear again.

Obviously Rhino Stomp's CC isn't as good as hard CC, it comes with damage AND CC and that would make it OP as fuck. But even so, the existence of other CC doesn't make it useless.