Talk:Secura Penta/@comment-78.195.146.116-20150822103023/@comment-24.13.81.17-20150906061723

Gotta laugh at the name calling in this thread. Throwing insults out because you disagree with an opinion, and then calling them "boy" on top... First off your lack of maturity kind of ricochets that back in your face. Second of all, how would you know the age or sex of the commentator? Surely not by dint of your stellar intelligence or judgement.

Personally I try to respect that there are many opinions, and there are many play styles that can work well in very different ways. Dismissing other choices because you don't like them is up to you, but do try not to push your opinions on other folks and insult them in the same breath.

BTW. I've used several sidearms such as Synoid Gammacor with ammo mutation to great effect  As it happens I don't use them much because that's not my personal favorite way to play.

Another point concerning ammo management is that most people don't use ammo restores. If you're so hung up on not using ammo mutation, drop a restore now and then.

Oh and Gamacor doesn"t "require" ammo mutation either, the mod just makes it easier to not have to worry about ammo management as much.

As to there being nothing wrong with gammacor before the nerf? Hey, I had fun using it before the nerf bomb, but it was so OP'd I saw the nerf coming pretty early on. From a players point of view there might be nothing wrong with an OP'd weapon. From developers and game balancing perspectives, there was indeed something wrong.

If you want to look at things that are wrong, look at the poor record DE has had with balancing weapons  before releasing them. I sometimes wonder how much resources DE devotes to playtesting. While I understood the need for the nerf of the gammacor,  the need for a nerf because of the way they released it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.