Talk:Multishot/@comment-194.66.78.125-20160317111321/@comment-26811107-20160328063036

They might have said "multishot wasn't intended to ignore ammo needs" but in practice that is a faulty statement simply because if that was the case why have they ammo nerfed some weapons? For example the Penta and the Ogris - if "Multishot wasn't supposed to ignore ammo needs" applies to them - take the 29 ammo gimp and divide it by three. - that's less than 7 ammo (individual shots). So they "intended" to only have 7 shots per clip in the Penta and Ogris? No, it's more pre-nerf excuse making, like they always do with the flimsy excuses to justify nerfing. And using the term "game balancing" willy nilly is getting ridiculous. Everything isn't game balance and that cannot be used to excuse away whatever changes DE makes in every situation. Does not make one look like they know what they are talking about either, because anyone with half a brain can see what balamces the game and what doesn't - and this will not.

Peiople shouldn't just "wait and see" what they do because it's always a sour result (remember Covert Lethality?). They cannot be trusted to respect people's efforts, expectations and time (not to mention money), and people need to complain and express themselves and not let them make these decisions in peace - because you will not like the result - they have proven that over and over again.