Talk:Inaros/@comment-28318481-20160427111333

Am i the only one who thinks that Inaros' lore is a bit out of place?

" Inaros was displeased with the Orokin's methods after seeing them first hand". I hought that Warframes don't have sentience. How can it be "displeased"? And from the narrative i had the impression that Inaros was initially used by Orokin to kidnap Phobos' inhabitants. Which makes him/it accomplice rather than witness.

Also, " rebelled, eventually leading the slaughter of the Orokin"? Does it imply that Collapse was orchestrated by Inaros and not Rebecc... Lotus?