Talk:Speed Drift/@comment-130.245.194.147-20151215213533/@comment-24613667-20160324221944

OP says that Nova and Loki are the most efficient, which is probably based on personal experience.

Two other Lone Tenno show up to say "no, Loki and Nova are shit, try something different and stop using popular things because reasons".

Enter me, making a snarky remark about peoples' close-mindedness for giving shit to the OP's suggestions. Admittedly, at least the first reply suggested Hydroid, giving some semblence of helpful information.

Nova and Loki are great for acrobatics and bypassing puzzles. Why would you use frames that are less effctive at these things? I'm not going to rush through a timed puzzle with Chroma or Saryn because they're inherently slower and have no mobility tools. That's not to say that they're the only frames that can do it, but you shouldn't not use them because other people are sick of seeing them. Likewise, I wouldn't take Loki or Nova for the Endurance test because they're squishy as hell. Should people try new things? Absolutely, but they should also use the appropraite tools for what they're trying to accomplish.

And, I don't own, nor will I ever own, a high horse. In fact, I'm here to knock people off theirs, people who think that the popular "meta" frames/weapons should never be used because they're popular. It's like when a hipster's favorite thing goes mainstream and they give everyone else shit for liking it. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean someone else can't like that thing.