Talk:New Loka/@comment-2.126.95.98-20150309021957

When they talk about humanity I think they are trying to purge. Why not like Cephalon Suda apart from the fact they are AI? I am with Cephalon Suda because I find joy in learning. Her enemies are those who force something on people. 'Living with no technology' and 'death by fire'.

When it came to New Loka, at first I thought they were all right, then I saw them becoming hateful and restrictive. They cannot coexist with anyone who does not follow their ideas. If they want to trundle back to Earth and start a 'pure' life (define that) then fine, go on then, use all that technology to voice your cause and restore Earth only to then abandon said technology. The most worrying thing for me was the possible Genocide of AI. Cephalon Suda's goal is knowledge - New Loka seem to want to kill that - reminds me of 'thou shalt not eat from the tree of knowledge'.

I hear the appeal to nature fallacy too much in the real world, I have no desire to see this elsewhere. Being anti-tech doesn't mean you're being good to the earth, it means you're anti-tech. Technology can help as well.

Sorry, knowledge before scaremongering agenda.

The Grineer cloning isn't necessarily an argument for New Loka. They rushed into a process. If they had taken time to come up with better and better processes, they might have not had to cope with such awful degradation. It is not as if 'purity' means 'no degradation'. Purity likely means also rejecting any life extending technology, which means degradation as quickly as it used to be possibly.