Talk:Jat Kusar/@comment-163.172.132.199-20180531212840/@comment-25254386-20180601040514

First off, not once did I ever mention your mental state, I'm not sure where you got that from.

Second, not a single on of my examples were "metaphorical". Those are the exact words used by dictionaries, and used in the same way you claim innate to only be applicable to born/alive things. By you calling those four example metaphorical you are literally just discrediting your own evidence.

Third, this isn't a crusade, this is me arguing with you that innate, factually, does not only mean a trait or ability that is learned my the mind. Is that one of the definitions? Yes, we've established that. Is it the only definition? No, we've also established that, yet you seem to be too stubborn to even acknowledge this fact.

The main point is that the use of the word "innate" across the Wiki is completely, and objectively appropriate. Your sudden and unfounded attempt to try and correct was not only wrong, but was also poorly delivered, distastefully aggressive, and not helpful or "fair" in the least.

Your continual provocation of the subject, and inability to check your attitude and superiority complex is what is warranting my pursuit against your logic. You continue to try to strengthen your point, yet when they are rebutted (which all of them successfully have been thus far) you seem to resort to more ad-hominem-styled arguments than regualer ones. Aggression will be met with aggression, respect will be met with respect. If you can't handle it then don't dish it out.