Talk:Detron/@comment-24682619-20140505090520/@comment-89.123.47.231-20140514094223

Your OPINION that energy-based weapons should outclass bullet-using ones is just that - an opinion, one not based on logic but cool-factor and bias. I get it, I really do. But in reality bullets are FAR more effective then energy weapons, at least with current and forseeable technology. A well-crafted bullet smokes a lazor IRL in terms of damage.

As for future tech, keep in mind that e=mc^2 means that a small amount of mass can release a HUGE amount of energy - in other words a tiny bullet can generate more damage then a slim beam of radiation can, if the means by which this is achived is extreamly efficient.

Also, you forgot Drakgoon, the under-rated Grakata and the entire Wraith set. But more importantly, you DO realize this is a matter of game-ballance, right? No one faction (except Primes, for lore reasons) should have better weapons then the other, that defeats the point of aquiring them. If they do, it's temporary and only a matter of time until it shifts the other way.

If anything, you should really have sed you like the FLAVOR of Corpus weapons, as do I for that matter. Because that's ALL your argument boils down to. It's why they all have an obvious visual theme, as well as a not-so-obvious mechanical one, as do Grineer weapons - to attract different people.

My point is before you cry to the heavens about things you don't remotely understand, try to think a bit more and see if it's actually only personal taste. Because if it is, you're only making yourself look like a fool when you claim it's fact.

Hek, here's a free life lesson - sometimes silence is golden, especially when you don't have a clue on sed subject matter; that goes double when in public.