Talk:Focus 2.0/@comment-42.61.175.65-20180410095601/@comment-24.34.18.164-20180421002714

I think they're poorly named. The fact that we have some nodes specifically called out as "way-bound" implies that other nodes are not bound to the school, and therefore would be active regardless of what school is your primary. Worse, we have "primary" and "secondary" schools rather than "active" and "inactive." Since these other schools are "secondary" rather than "inactive" it again implies that their effects, minus the "way-bound" ones, are available while another school is primary.

I would rename the non-bound nodes to "way-locked" to differentiate them from "way-bound" and make it clear that they do nothing without being primary. And/or, change the "secondary" schools to "inactive" to make it clear that they provide no effects.