Talk:Jat Kusar/@comment-163.172.132.199-20180531212840/@comment-25254386-20180601025650

I'm not sure why you think everybody and their grandma has common knowledge of the philosophical version of "innate". It's bizarre, but even more so that you continue to argue that version is the only valid and correct use when it's been pointed out, by three different people now, that innate has multiple meanings and uses.

Not a single person has bothered to try to 'correct' us on the use of innate. There's been an unspoken understanding of its use for the past 5 years on this Wiki alone, until now.

Btw, you know what other words have different meanings than their original definitions or derivatives?
 * 1) Ego - originally Latin for "I", now used to describe a person's sense of self.
 * 2) Born - to either have been brought into life through birth, or to simply be brought into existence.
 * 3) Definition - originally Latin for "set bounds to", now used in two main ways: an exact statement or description of the nature, scope, or meaning of something, and the degree of distinctness in outline of an object, image, or sound, especially of an image in a photograph or on a screen.
 * 4) Innate - existing in, belonging to, or determined by factors present in an individual from birth, PHILOSOPHY: originating in the mind, and/or belonging to the essential nature of something