Talk:Railjack/Armaments/@comment-47.16.154.221-20191225152935

A Vidar Cryophon MK III with a 50% damage bonus does 6610.5 frost damage while the Zetki Cryophon MK III does a constant 6611.0 frost damage. At the maximum bonus of 60% weapon damage, a Vidar Cryophon MK III would have 7051.2 frost damage. Compared to the stats of the Zetki Cryophon MK III, Vidar has: 28% crit chance to Zekti's 20% (+8% crit chance for Vidar) 250 heat accretion to Zekti's 400 (-150 heat accretion for Vidar)  30% status chance to Zekti's 45% (-15 status chance for Vidar)  a constant 1.00 fire rate to Zekti's variable 1.30-1.60% In terms of raw damage and assuming you don't care as much about status procs, a Vidar Cryophon MK III above 50% weapon damage outperforms a Zekti Cryophon MK III in terms of damage per shot, crit chance, heat accreation, and resource cost. Imo fire rate is not as much of a limiting factor to DPS as heat capacity/overheating, especially since the 400 heat accretion of the Zekti Cryophon MK III means you'll be overheating after 3-4 consecutive shots anyway. So basically a Vidar Cryophon MK III @ +50% weapon damage > Zekti Cryophon MK III if my math is correct.