Talk:Loki (Warframe)/@comment-186.15.86.44-20130720182215/@comment-76.122.3.165-20130721075510

I agree with you in that Loki is completely ineffective imo. Though I'd sooner say he just doesn't fit my playstyle. People like to give me a lot of excuses for why he's useful, but there are too many frames that just plain overshadow him. The "solo boss" excuse doesn't float with me since I can solo bosses with any and all frames. The "radial disarm is useful" excuse is a no go for me as well. I don't care if they can shoot or not. Them being able to shoot doesn't bother me. Maybe in nightmare mode without a sentinel or with shade he might be useful. Since his Inivisibility is no good if they can still shoot at your sentinel and stray bullets still manage to hit you. Least it lasts longer and melee dmg is higher than Ash's smoke bomb. Though his at least cloaks the sentinel as well and the devs did mention that those skills work as intended (if I remember correctly). Decoy is nice and it's better than molt, but quite frankly I'm fine with molt so who cares about decoy... considering the other skills at my disposal. Switch teleport. People tell me that it has value, but I see none what so ever. At best it's a troll skill and any "value" it may possess to some is BS on a whole other level. The arguement of "advanced players" is complete crap... since most lokis spend their time on the ground I suppose that a lot of them aren't advanced. I've never spent time on the ground as a loki, but one of the many loki lovers and defenders from my clan spent so much time resting down there I found his arguements to be completely invalid. Quite frankly you should never be eatin dirt unless your using an ogris or thunderbolt. If you party with me and defend loki and I see you eatin dirt... don't expect a res. Like the frame all you want, but don't spew garbage at me about how "good" Loki is. He's fine for what he is, but there are better and more useful choices if you plan to group with others.