Talk:J3-Golem/@comment-79.172.115.85-20130603134915

Am I the only one irritated by Lotus' "have increased exponentialy" comment?

Exponenetial increase has no meaning outside of growth classification. Growth classification have no place inside a one-time change. My knowledge of english may be lacking but aren't continous processes meant to be worded with "have been increasing"?

I dunno what has supposedly happened with the ammount of reports, but if "there were suddenly a lot more of them" than it's not "exponentialy" and if "they were growing with continiously alarming rate for some time" than it's not "have".